![]() ![]() "Justice will only be done if Hemy Neuman spends the rest of his life in prison. Sneiderman’s widow, Andrea, directed Petchenik to a statement she gave in August 2019 after Dekalb Superior Court Judge Gregory Adams denied his request for a trial. The justices could take several months to issue a ruling.Ĭhannel 2′s Mike Petchenik reached out to Rusty’s parents through their former attorney, but they had no comment on Neuman’s latest attempt at a new trial. “I don’t concede that was later determined to be privileged information, is an appearance of impropriety,” she said. “The state experts in the first trial came to that conclusion prior to the disclosure.”Ĭross further argued there was no evidence prosecutors committed any kind of misconduct. “The information that was deemed privileged by the two non-testifying experts, prior to the first trial…played no role in either state’s expert the first time coming to the conclusion the defendant was malingering,” she said. “In this case, the information goes to the heart of the defense.”īut Anna Cross, who prosecuted Neuman’s second trial, argued that the argument doesn’t apply to the second trial and the witnesses she called to the stand. “It’s essentially something that can’t be untangled from the way the prosecution presents its case,” Tarleton argued. ![]() This time around, Justices appeared skeptical, at one point asking whether it was any “secret” that prosecutors believed Neuman was malingering, or faking, his mental illness. However, in 2016, another jury convicted Neuman a second time. “You can’t require the defense team to present any sort of affirmative evidence to disprove that the state didn’t use the privileged information.”Ī similar argument after his first trial resulted the Supreme Court overturning his first conviction in 2015. Neuman was malingering,” said Michael Tarleton. “Specifically they had information that at least one of the experts that they were consulting with did think it was strongly possible that Mr. In a virtual hearing Wednesday before the Georgia Supreme Court, Neuman’s attorney argued information prosecutors obtained about a defense expert prior to his first trial tainted the case and should be grounds to overturn his second conviction.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |